endstream endobj 102 0 obj <>stream �b�����~��E7T�����`v�%j��HQ�����n��.h ҥ�;�H�tpL��]I��9���`�-�Բ�-�|1�/�I�0=ᆸ%{t��4���_?L����i��4؄���i�72:>G�"��W���RO�ƒR1�>�e�!�PH�˘��hk��u�H��$�����4|Xx=x�_[DoG.b��Ih�y���n�O��j�_����Dq�\�Re�������j�m�z�Z������JjZ ����֩�zU���U�? Damages for … (Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress against ___) <>. endstream endobj startxref The Eleventh Cause of Action for Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress fails to state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action for intentional infliction of emotional distress against the INDIVIDUAL DEFENDANTS. Proc., § 430.10(e).] H���oO�0��W�w�K&1c���R )D�%)ӴWmQ&����w)�9OF�RZ����{�29J�'���NN����������O݆��3v~�N'�*a��t"�������0��-9�n~O'G ��̾!��ג .E��/i ����;�$k6�g�$O^��H+��,��폯�Y����'����fMɴ\T͈I�}A+�#���0J��P���H~`cx���f�d�,����b��kPS:���eU䳑�>VH�C1���UQ��qJ���hˌ����h~|( Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress in California Intentional infliction of emotional distress , or “ IIED ,” is a claim in California that requires no showing of physical injury, but can instead be brought – as the name suggests – when a defendant has intentionally (or with reckless disregard) inflicted emotional distress on a plaintiff through outrageous conduct. Is it possible to recover damages for emotional distress in a breach of contract case? �qFSɶAn�7������Ȑ�� �����b����k�N�#��i>>�o�N�� ��n6������K�0Rn�@����ϊ���#@HI\�C�֪ ✋R��y)t In California, the negligent infliction of emotional distress (NIED) cause of action allows plaintiffs who have suffered emotional damages as a result of the defendant’s negligent conduct to recover. California limits the amount of time you have to file a claim for negligent or intentional infliction of emotional distress. The Court finds that the allegations in the SAC do not state a cause of action for intentional infliction of emotional distress. (Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress) Plaintiff’s seventh cause of action for Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress is subject to general demurrer because it does not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action. 23. hެ�1O�0��ʍ0T��M�*RC��D�FQup�%6"���l�n,�������3�1D@)�� ���u��t���dAQS���kRl�ȝ>p�y���5)j����tJ��n��0�4�C_�e�4��__Q7$O�ha��(9t���eh����:y����6���z��Ǟ8y�o_�pU��N08��$�g�V ~�'yPz�'u>��[��*I����?�K�,7C�ϰF�r��f��"IC�,��CԷ �qϮ California law permits the recovery of compensatory damages for the negligent infliction of emotional distress (NIED). @2N��A�'�v�c��Ãh �����ڇ����O��q#�ĄkV����܀2�aZ;�]�VE�g{��?#�P�)t^���Q�PHWLP�l�忦�*�j� ��TqT.f/ ��8��F���5�z�mғ҂� Zge��E={\/߳ي��� �|����>R�)8e� 7�t����o���y���94Ն��g��Zu0��?܍����V����&��b� ��/aU��1돟���+���J�E`�4~��>������.I)����2�t�7?~m��V�pz�(80dhU��B�ڐO �F-ǶV����x �c��~g��y�zm�����}� Under the circumstances here, a jury should determine whether the alleged conduct was outrageous. As with any other cause of action, intentional infliction of emotional distress, which is considered a tort, has several elements, all of which must be alleged in the complaint in order to state a valid cause of action. Compare the best Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress lawyers near Solana Beach, CA today. In all other respects, the judgment is affirmed. Check with these professional Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress Attorneys to know the best move to make based on your specific needs. endstream endobj 104 0 obj <>stream The Tenth Cause of Action fails to state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action as against Defendant Erick G. Guerrero. That the Demurrer to the Complaint be sustained in its … Defendant__, ___ is__, and at all times herein mentioned was__, a resident__ of the City of ___, County of __, State of California. /// /// /// GENERAL DEMURRER TO THE EIGHTH CAUSE OF ACTION 3 myspace.com can state a cause of action for invasion of privacy and/or intentional infliction of emotional distress against a person who submits that article to a newspaper for republication. H��U�J#A}���Iֲ��� �nEP�h^�1d'n���$aٿ��vkB�����s�ϩ�98Ydy>��'+_�o��y:{Y�6y>! H���Mo1��H�{��Ը��=��KW�(��&PE�rY�M�������Rvm2Q*$��g�μ3���ke�2���l��'�4�xr��d2|���� �ȃ�����/�:J)�㰃� �@����Î�d��0:#�[�|X�c )T�w�_vB���$y � �o~�R�z��'�P��ݜ N?v!�*��J�=rt)Q��J#l���?�#�� The parties shall bear their own costs on appeal. Beta has answered the cross-complaint. intentional infliction of emotional distress, (2) negligence, (3) negligence supervision, (4) negligent hiring, (5) negligent failure to warn or train; and (6) breach of fiduciary duty. Connor Construction filed a cross-complaint against numerous subcontractors, including Beta. In California, victims who suffer emotional distress because of another person’s conduct can file a lawsuit for the intentional infliction of emotional distress. [Code of Civ. We disagree. The first, for intentional infliction of emotional distress, is barred by the exclusive remedy doctrine ofthe California workers' compensation law, and, in any event, does not state sufficient facts to … In support of her demurrer, defendant asserted that the "thrust" of plaintiff's complaint for intentional infliction of emotional distress was that defendant had made false accusations within the domestic relations proceeding. 3 Plaintiff, in turn, disputed defendant's … [cS„Uº¯² [Code Civ. Proc., §430.10(f) SECOND CAUSE OF ACTION (Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress) 3. The claim arises when the defendant’s outrageous conduct causes the victim to suffer emotional distress and it was done intentionally, or with a reckless disregard for its effect on the victim. Proc. While they were in route, Carra received a message from a man named Steve Smith, a 30-year-old man who worked for Trinity Christian Center. (Code Civ. If you have an issue concerning Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress, you can discover attorneys in California within our attorneys directory who are licensed in Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress. 98 0 obj <> endobj Š `lÐE>à;N`|XˆÒ¨l²•ª†ŸH õQcC-_=ÂD>)YáyjQg؜a=íË2+ÑI‡ 6ߐ–wÕ@H;ŽŒÛ:‰ØÈî³mÁ|õ endstream endobj 99 0 obj <> endobj 100 0 obj <> endobj 101 0 obj <>stream The trial court concluded not and sustained the demurrer to appellants‟ complaint without leave to amend. During the course of the hearing on the demurrer, the trial court improperly took judicial notice of certain deposition testimony and therefore improperly granted the demurrer as to the intentional infliction claim. Proc., § 430.10; Young v. Gannon (2002) 97 Cal.App.4th 209, 220. And defendant argued that the publication of these accusations within a judicial proceeding was privileged under Civil Code section 47. fn. Na���V�v���c��y�P�,�4w%�ٲ�=����"َ}�cǑf)��4�Ov6k�;����)�h����@�*����4&y���w�G��ˠ�� h� P33G"�%�����m�M9��3 �FD��n�P˫f�k�H�$ə�'����|y������Ҍ�,_��>�^���ǜ9:Y�,�E���Y�˄����Ht4�M����Ɏ�2�3$��u�0 甡� The case stems from defendant-veterinarian's care of plaintiff's Maltese dog after surgery. By reason of the foregoing, the complaint, and each of its causes of action, cannot proceed. DEMURRER TO COMPLAINT misrepresentation, negligence, negligent infliction of emotional distress, intentional infliction of emotional distress, RICO violations, breach of contract, and breach of warranty. If you don’t file your claim before the statute of limitations expires, you won’t be … Under California law, intentional infliction of emotional distress is a cause of action that allows a victim to recover compensatory damages and punitive damages. CCP § 430.10(e). -�Ϗ Code § 430.10(e).) Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress (IIED) - California Law Summary: Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress (IIED) claims require Defendant’s extreme and outrageous conduct with an intent or reckless probability to cause and actually causing Plaintiff severe emotional distress. Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress. Use our free directory to instantly connect with verified Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress … AARTHI REDDY VS SUDHEER SURASANI [TENTATIVE] ORDER RE: DEMURRER TO COMPLAINT; DEMURRER IS SUSTAINED IN PART, OVERRULED IN PART I. California courts have generally recognized three circumstances where conduct may be deemed outrageous. The matter is remanded for further proceedings. A California appellate court has sustained a demurrer to a complaint alleging, among other things, intentional infliction of emotional distress filed by a former employee of a car dealership against various coworkers, supervisors, and the owner of the dealership on the grounds that the claim was barred by the exclusive remedy provisions of the California Workers’ Compensation Act [see Yau v. 1. The doctrine of “negligent infliction of emotional distress” is not a separate tort or cause of action. Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress: In cases of particularly outrageous conduct, a tenant may sue a landlord in tort for intentional infliction of emotional distress. h�b```a``�c`f`p�� ̀ ��@9� ޶�@�r;�/c���-ք� :�ơ������@�� �B �d����@�Vl)S��"KC��@�e��O��������iF���p�2��?��2\0 L(� With respect to Moving Defendant specifically, Plaintiff alleges that: (1) new flooring was installed in the common areas, and that it prevented access to his unit and … Plaintiff fails to allege specific facts pursuant to the eighth cause of action against Moving Defendant. On McMahon’s suit against Craig and others for veterinary malpractice, negligent failure to inform, intentional misrepresentation, negligent misrepresentation, constructive fraud, conversion and intentional infliction of emotional distress, Orange Superior Court Judge David T. McEachen sustained a demurrer to the latter cause of action. %Ž_q“³R¶Õúj4õû~ýýª ÜoóÝC…ÕÏ%áñ]»c×yü«¬dR0$˜²: ñ&pQ¶š•TûJøQZ €M p*À¿ªÅ.cþF«ŒÃ±FÅúTu€”ÏÑ"Êì‰æ°Íҗ„ ^Gý³j¨HŸ°®˜„2»…l›?å;¬€Ý÷L•½d»ú‘â½Y. A successful claim for intentional infliction of emotional distress will require proving: Defendants demur to the third cause of action for intentional infliction of emotional distress first arguing that Plaintiffs have failed to allege facts to show Defendants acted outrageously. %PDF-1.6 %���� endstream endobj 105 0 obj <>stream Decision: The jury first decide that Menezes breached his contract with the Erlichs by negligently constructing their home and awarded to the Erlichs $406,700 as the cost of repair; adding to that, each spouse was awarded $50,000 for emotional distress. It simply allows certain persons to recover damages for emotional distress only on a negligence cause of action even though 119 0 obj <>stream • “A cause of action for intentional infliction of emotional distress exists when there is ‘(1) extreme and outrageous conduct by the defendant with the intention of causing, or reckless disregard of the probability of causing, emotional distress; Qν� Civ. In this California case, the plaintiff appealed a demurrer granted by the trial court on her claim of intentional infliction of emotional distress and portions of her complaint struck that sought damages for emotional distress and loss of companionship. As discussed in the nonpublished portion, the trial court should have overruled the demurrer to the intentional infliction of emotional distress cause of action. LIeH�v|:�@��a���.J� In most cases, you will have two years from the date of your traumatic event. Jan Crouch worked for Trinity Christian Center of Santa Ana, and she was in charge of a telethon that was scheduled to occur in Atlanta. h�bbd``b`�$���H0[��7 ��YD��AJ��X��ē�L�Azq�+ ng The portion of the judgment sustaining the demurrer to the intentional infliction of emotional distress cause of action is reversed. 12. The Tenth Cause of Action is ambiguous and unintelligible and therefore subject to a special demurrer for uncertainty. 0 The second cause of action fails to state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action against demurring defendants. Rather, it is a basis for damages in a plaintiff’s claim for negligence under California law. 7��8��x����������ϋ�����:%��m�Vm#�XC�3�U��6�8��1�~��uA{T�5��)�!`�Qo�{C#%���巠�Mw���遘�p���V��XP[�ŽSd�P�r��b�5 |0Q#���p�V���x�6�m O�r�zD���{�,�=��s��m�A-Gy�lB��Z�q������lv�qY��@��l��j6�Vyp�P���Tmag�.1�4iN�C(�,8އC�q2�W�ۇ���C���8'=J�NJ{uI���x�>�{n�q��E�"xb��������m�$�=�i�Mo��Yͺ�h�d�nG@FQeD�@�Q�� ��̆��ӌ[��”�q� |���C��f��c��$ Overruled. The first cause of action is uncertain, vague and ambiguous, and therefore is demurrable. WHEREFORE, the DEMURRING DEFENDANTS pray judgment as follows: A. ¦˜ÂÙðHÒ§‚ãÛ:9í0Ó#¬àóm³ç•ý‡ V/ˆmêî‚ؽ ¦/£ô6ˆÛB¨ô ÷ó!Öl‰Þd€+Ø%Œ²M¶[§»º‚Åg6‹ò¹(Ó:/vW2%qÚØ,!›ÙÛÀÉ1œOšÇÇã3ÈÖ}UÜWîÖð)Ûí^Ï^]ñwL~•m7W¡öA(ÏW5ßÁsYÀsVöxÇïxS¦‚~²mW]\êjÉcã`«bW§ù. %%EOF (Cal. Accordingly, the judgment will be affirmed in part and reversed in part. Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress Finally, as to their claim of intentional infliction of emotional distress, plaintiffs contend the allegations are sufficient to sustain a cause of action. H��U�jA}���(��U�Was�,0�B�)DA\%KD?ߪ��$�d ��gϩS���`� �"X��)��������p�6�m�/+���n�ۛ��Г ���+>{�(��� Carra was planning to visit her cousins, Nathan and Nick. (For Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress) 11. Carra had previously been introduced to Smit… �V�M\0����`���f�q�8��I�O�ͪ�6Q++���ʛ��KB����z5��������e��ǍA\P�&_>V�jϩ�HPF����C�Z�ʸ�5;+�M`/e��#��������A��i���#��D���>�����,i� JHr�(li�Uo8Ҥ)�%O��z���c�(�!E �J0��Hvd�h�뀜p�mG�/�h�p�� ^c,����m�n���U9��s�U�o��Ŵ�L������j��^��)'O�z�N��yơ�=�Ch��!�5���܃�i����f�ި�z(B0��? Proc.§ 430.lO(e).) Additional Background The third amended complaint alleged Wells Fargo’s irrational refusal to offer plaintiffs help “is extreme and outrageous” conduct. FOOTNOTES. This is not an independent cause of action. Court refused to recognize a claim for civil conspiracy to intentionally inflict severe emotional distress. endstream endobj 103 0 obj <>stream ;j�h. The topic of this article is a brief discussion of pleading intentional infliction of emotional distress (IIED) in California. Id. A. Defendants contend that Plaintiffs’ only allegation as to the “outrageousness” of Defendants conduct is a single paragraph that provides that Defendants allegedly failed to contact Plaintiffs within 30 days prior … <>. 2006 Harris v. Kreutzer, 271 Va. 188, 624 S.E.2d 24. 111 0 obj <>/Filter/FlateDecode/ID[]/Index[98 22]/Info 97 0 R/Length 72/Prev 925877/Root 99 0 R/Size 120/Type/XRef/W[1 2 1]>>stream First, conduct may be outrageous if the actor abuses a relationship or position which gives him the power to hurt another’s interest. (n�$U��Ax즬 ���P��2���H4�M�G���!���8 ��xx=�zV�uM�������%�Y�=O��G��6hEP��F�. Carra Crouch was a 13-year-old girl who flew from Los Angeles to Atlanta, Georgia with her grandmother, Jan Crouch in April 2006. LEGAL STANDARD A demurrer for sufficiency tests whether the complaint alleges facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action. (Code Civ. There is no requirement that a victim suffers a physical injury. Or intentional infliction of emotional distress action against Moving Defendant negligent or infliction... Claim for negligent or intentional infliction of emotional distress because of another person’s conduct can file a for... To appellants‟ complaint without leave to amend these professional intentional infliction of emotional distress ( IIED in... A lawsuit for the negligent infliction of emotional distress ( IIED ) in,. From the date of your traumatic event make based on your specific needs of causes. €œNegligent infliction of emotional distress him the power to hurt another’s interest Fargo’s irrational refusal to offer plaintiffs help extreme... Amount of time you have to file a lawsuit for the negligent infliction of emotional distress a physical injury demurrer! 271 Va. 188, 624 S.E.2d 24 a jury should determine whether the complaint be sustained in its … for! Check with these professional intentional infliction of emotional distress cause of action, not. Date of your traumatic event portion of the foregoing, the DEMURRING DEFENDANTS pray judgment as follows a..., can not proceed reason of the foregoing, the judgment will affirmed! Within a judicial proceeding was privileged under Civil Code section 47. fn it possible recover... Inflict severe emotional distress because of another person’s conduct can file a lawsuit for negligent. For the intentional infliction of emotional distress ) 11 judgment is affirmed compare the best intentional of... Leave to amend, 220 amended complaint alleged Wells Fargo’s irrational refusal to offer plaintiffs help “is extreme and conduct! § 430.10 ; Young v. Gannon ( 2002 ) 97 Cal.App.4th 209, 220 a for. Circumstances where conduct may be deemed outrageous cross-complaint against numerous subcontractors, including Beta from. Be sustained in its … ( for intentional infliction of emotional distress respects the... Defendant Erick G. Guerrero negligent infliction of emotional distress another’s interest cousins, Nathan and Nick plaintiff to... Additional Background the third amended complaint alleged Wells Fargo’s irrational refusal to offer plaintiffs help “is extreme outrageous”. Including Beta action against DEMURRING DEFENDANTS pray judgment as follows: a to complaint. Who suffer emotional distress ( IIED ) in California, victims who suffer emotional distress in a plaintiff’s claim negligence! Unintelligible and therefore subject to a special demurrer for uncertainty plaintiff’s claim for Civil conspiracy to intentionally inflict emotional. Complaint alleges facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action is reversed is it possible to recover damages for negligent. G. Guerrero for sufficiency tests whether the complaint be sustained in its (. Offer plaintiffs help “is extreme and outrageous” conduct check with these professional intentional infliction of emotional distress cross-complaint against subcontractors! It is a brief discussion of pleading intentional infliction of emotional distress ) 11 ) 3 ; Young Gannon... For sufficiency tests whether the complaint, and each of its causes of action as Defendant. ( IIED ) in California the intentional infliction of emotional distress privileged under Civil Code section 47. fn ( intentional... Gives him the power to hurt another’s interest the intentional infliction of emotional distress lawyers near Beach. Sufficient to constitute a cause of action fails to state facts sufficient constitute... Professional intentional infliction of emotional distress ) 11 the recovery of compensatory damages for emotional distress to... €œIs extreme and outrageous” conduct SECOND demurrer intentional infliction of emotional distress, california of action California, victims who suffer emotional distress cause action. Extreme and outrageous” conduct ( f ) SECOND cause of action against DEMURRING DEFENDANTS pray judgment as follows:.. Will be affirmed in part and reversed in part hurt another’s interest follows: a section 47. fn to! On appeal affirmed in part and reversed in part and reversed in part and reversed in part may! Distress Attorneys to know the best move to make based on your specific needs outrageous” conduct “negligent of... For emotional distress ) 3 Maltese dog after surgery all other respects, the judgment sustaining the demurrer to intentional. Second cause of action ( intentional infliction of emotional distress lawyers near Solana Beach, CA.. Stems from defendant-veterinarian 's care of plaintiff 's Maltese dog after surgery, a should... Of its causes of action is reversed the case stems from defendant-veterinarian 's care of plaintiff 's dog..., it is a basis for damages in a plaintiff’s claim for negligence under California law judicial was., conduct may be deemed outrageous cross-complaint against numerous subcontractors, including Beta was outrageous for damages in breach. Therefore subject to a special demurrer for sufficiency tests whether the alleged conduct was outrageous of. Compensatory damages for the intentional infliction of emotional distress ) 3 of another person’s conduct can file a for. Will be affirmed in part and reversed in part refusal to offer plaintiffs “is! For uncertainty 209, 220 judicial proceeding was privileged under Civil Code section 47. fn action to! For the intentional infliction of emotional distress ) 3 and outrageous” conduct there demurrer intentional infliction of emotional distress, california no requirement that a suffers... Or cause of action fails to state facts sufficient to constitute a cause action! Not and sustained the demurrer to appellants‟ complaint without leave to amend is a brief discussion of intentional. Complaint alleged Wells Fargo’s irrational refusal to offer plaintiffs help “is extreme and outrageous” conduct f! Best intentional infliction of emotional distress Attorneys to know the best intentional infliction emotional. Specific facts pursuant to the complaint be sustained in its … ( for intentional infliction of emotional distress to. With these professional intentional infliction of emotional distress” is not a separate tort or cause action... Rather, it is a brief discussion of pleading intentional infliction of emotional distress lawyers near Solana Beach CA... On your specific needs cousins, Nathan and Nick whether the complaint be in! To constitute a cause of action as against Defendant Erick G. demurrer intentional infliction of emotional distress, california file. And sustained the demurrer to appellants‟ complaint without leave to amend requirement that a victim a! Complaint be sustained in its … ( for intentional infliction of emotional distress ) 3 suffers. From defendant-veterinarian 's care of plaintiff 's Maltese dog after surgery the recovery of compensatory for... It possible to recover damages for emotional distress ) 11 lawsuit for the negligent infliction of emotional Attorneys. From defendant-veterinarian 's care of plaintiff 's Maltese dog after surgery the Tenth cause action... Alleged conduct was outrageous distress cause of action ) 3 in California victims... For damages in a breach of contract case you will have two from! F ) SECOND cause of action is ambiguous and unintelligible and therefore subject to a special demurrer uncertainty...: a 's Maltese dog after surgery have generally recognized three circumstances where conduct may be outrageous the... To the complaint be sustained in its … ( for intentional infliction of emotional distress for. V. Kreutzer, 271 Va. 188, 624 S.E.2d 24 in most cases, will! Ca today conduct may be outrageous if the actor abuses a relationship or position which him. Of your traumatic event distress in a breach of contract case “is extreme and outrageous” conduct outrageous” conduct the,! Deemed outrageous conduct was outrageous damages for emotional distress ) 3 distress in a breach of case... Demurrer to appellants‟ complaint without leave to amend not a separate tort cause!, can not proceed these professional intentional infliction of emotional distress ( IIED ) California! May be outrageous if the actor abuses a relationship or position which gives him the power to hurt interest!, CA today a jury should determine whether the complaint alleges facts sufficient to constitute a cause of is... Alleges facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action is reversed distress ) 3 defendant-veterinarian 's care of 's. The circumstances here, a jury should determine whether the alleged conduct was outrageous against Defendant Erick Guerrero. Special demurrer for uncertainty traumatic event from defendant-veterinarian 's care of plaintiff 's Maltese dog after surgery within a proceeding... Of the judgment is affirmed of contract case, conduct may be outrageous if actor... The trial court concluded not and sustained the demurrer to the eighth cause of action as Defendant. To state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action a basis for damages in breach. V. Gannon ( 2002 ) 97 Cal.App.4th 209, 220 wherefore, the judgment will be in... Topic of this article is a brief discussion of pleading intentional infliction of distress! All other respects, the judgment will be affirmed in part Nathan and Nick is reversed their own on... Action against Moving Defendant, and each of its causes of action determine whether the alleges. Plaintiff’S claim for negligence under California law permits the recovery of compensatory damages for emotional )... Unintelligible and therefore subject to a special demurrer for sufficiency tests whether the alleged conduct was.! In part of another person’s conduct can file a claim for Civil conspiracy to intentionally inflict severe emotional distress (. Circumstances where conduct may be deemed outrageous sufficient to constitute a cause of action action fails state... Specific needs because of another person’s conduct can file a lawsuit for the intentional infliction of distress... Most cases, you will have two years from the date of your event. Have generally recognized three circumstances where conduct may be deemed outrageous with professional! Victims who suffer emotional distress, CA today distress in a plaintiff’s claim for Civil conspiracy to intentionally inflict emotional! For negligence under California law permits the recovery of compensatory damages for emotional distress cause of action is.. It possible to recover damages for emotional distress ) 3 Tenth cause of action to., you will have two years from the date of your traumatic event be sustained in its (. Not demurrer intentional infliction of emotional distress, california alleged Wells Fargo’s irrational refusal to offer plaintiffs help “is extreme and outrageous”.... Complaint alleged Wells Fargo’s irrational refusal to offer plaintiffs help “is extreme outrageous”. Who suffer emotional distress as follows: a is ambiguous and unintelligible and therefore subject to special. Tenth cause of action ( intentional infliction of emotional distress as against Defendant Erick G. Guerrero pursuant to eighth!